553b2b2e5d
diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case:
// expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}
will match the following error messages from Clang:
candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
candidate function has different number of parameters
It will also match these other error messages:
candidate function
function has different number of parameters
number of parameters
This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup:
87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)
llvm-svn: 146619
27 lines
486 B
C
27 lines
486 B
C
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
|
|
|
|
// PR3592
|
|
static void* malloc(int);
|
|
static void* malloc(int size) {
|
|
return ((void*)0); /*do not use heap in this file*/
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void *calloc(int, int, int); // expected-warning{{incompatible redeclaration of library function 'calloc'}} \
|
|
// expected-note{{'calloc' is a builtin with type 'void *}}
|
|
|
|
void f1(void) {
|
|
calloc(0, 0, 0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void f2() {
|
|
int index = 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static int index;
|
|
|
|
int f3() {
|
|
return index << 2;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
typedef int rindex;
|