We don't need to do any additional recursion, we just need to analyze the APInt stored in the node. This matches what the ValueTracking versions do for IR.
llvm-svn: 316256
Summary:
We shouldn't recurse any further but it doesn't mean we shouldn't be able to give the known bits for a constant. The caller would probably like that we always return the right answer for a constant RHS. This matches what InstCombine does in this case.
I don't have a test case because this showed up while trying to revive D31724.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38967
llvm-svn: 316255
Minor addition and follow up of r314773 and r311533: this adds more
debug messages to the type legalizer. For each node, it dumps
legalization info for results and operands nodes, rather than just the
final legalized node.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38726
llvm-svn: 315904
This is only currently used for mad/fma transforms.
This is the only case where it should be used for AMDGPU,
so add an opcode to be sure.
llvm-svn: 315740
I don't know if we ever hit this case or not. Turning it into an assert only fired on expanding some atomic operation in a SystemZ lit test.
llvm-svn: 315648
Summary:
Add LLVM_FORCE_ENABLE_DUMP cmake option, and use it along with
LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS to set LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP.
Remove NDEBUG and only use LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP to enable dump methods.
Move definition of LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP from config.h to llvm-config.h so
it'll be picked up by public headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38406
llvm-svn: 315590
Eg:
insert v4i32 V, (v2i16 X), 2 --> shuffle v8i16 V', X', {0,1,2,3,8,9,6,7}
This is a generalization of the IR fold in D38316 to handle insertion into a non-undef vector.
We may want to abandon that one if we can't find value in squashing the more specific pattern sooner.
We're using the existing legal shuffle target hook to avoid AVX512 horror with vXi1 shuffles.
There may be room for improvement in the shuffle lowering here, but that would be follow-up work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38388
llvm-svn: 315460
The NumFixedArgs field of CallLoweringInfo is used by
TargetLowering::LowerCallTo to determine whether a given argument is passed
using the vararg calling convention or not (specifically, to set IsFixed for
each ISD::OutputArg).
Firstly, CallLoweringInfo::setLibCallee and CallLoweringInfo::setCallee both
incorrectly set NumFixedArgs based on the _previous_ args list. Secondly,
TargetLowering::LowerCallTo failed to increment NumFixedArgs when modifying
the argument list so a pointer is passed for the return value.
If your backend uses the IsFixed property or directly accesses NumFixedArgs,
it is _possible_ this change could result in codegen changes (although the
previous behaviour would have been incorrect). No such cases have been
identified during code review for any in-tree architecture.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37898
llvm-svn: 315457
Summary:
See https://llvm.org/PR33743 for more details
It seems that for non-power of 2 vector sizes, the algorithm can produce
non-matching sizes for input and result causing an assert.
This usually isn't a problem as the isAnyExtend check will weed these out, but
in some cases (most often with lots of undefined values for the mask indices) it
can pass this check for non power of 2 vectors.
Adding in an extra check that ensures that bit size will match for the result
and input (as required)
Subscribers: nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35241
llvm-svn: 315307
Summary:
FastISel::hasTrivialKill() was the only user of the "IntPtrTy" version of
Cast::isNoopCast(). According to review comments in D37894 we could instead
use the "DataLayout" version of the method, and thus get rid of the
"IntPtrTy" versions of isNoopCast() completely.
With the above done, the remaining isNoopCast() could then be simplified
a bit more.
Reviewers: arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38497
llvm-svn: 314969
It broke the Chromium / SQLite build; see PR34830.
> Summary:
> 1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
> extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
> appearing in the DAG.
> e.g.
> T1 = A + B
> T2 = T1 + 10
> T3 = T2 + A
> For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
> Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
>
> 2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
> so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
> could be factored out.
> e.g.
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
> will be factored as following
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
>
> 3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
> thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
>
> Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet, jmolloy
>
> Reviewed By: lsaba
>
> Subscribers: jmolloy, spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 314919
Summary:
1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
appearing in the DAG.
e.g.
T1 = A + B
T2 = T1 + 10
T3 = T2 + A
For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
could be factored out.
e.g.
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
will be factored as following
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet, jmolloy
Reviewed By: lsaba
Subscribers: jmolloy, spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 314886
Summary:
Take the target's endianness into account when splitting the
debug information in DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger.
This patch fixes so that, for big-endian targets, the fragment
expression corresponding to the high part of a split integer
value is placed at offset 0, in order to correctly represent
the memory address order.
I have attached a PPC32 reproducer where the resulting DWARF
pieces for a 64-bit integer were incorrectly reversed.
Original patch was reverted due to using -stop-after=isel in
the test case (but that is only working when AMDGPU target
is included in the llc build). The test case has now been
updated to use -stop-before=expand-isel-pseudos instead.
Patch by: dstenb
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie
Subscribers: nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38172
llvm-svn: 314781
This adds some more debug messages to the type legalizer and functions
like PromoteNode, ExpandNode, ExpandLibCall in an attempt to make
the debug messages a little bit more informative and useful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38450
llvm-svn: 314773
Summary:
Take the target's endianness into account when splitting the
debug information in DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger.
This patch fixes so that, for big-endian targets, the fragment
expression corresponding to the high part of a split integer
value is placed at offset 0, in order to correctly represent
the memory address order.
I have attached a PPC32 reproducer where the resulting DWARF
pieces for a 64-bit integer were incorrectly reversed.
Patch by: dstenb
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie
Subscribers: nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38172
llvm-svn: 314666
Currently expandUnalignedLoad/Store uses place holder pointer info for temporary memory operand
in stack, which does not have correct address space. This causes unaligned private double16 load/store to be
lowered to flat_load instead of buffer_load for amdgcn target.
This fixes failures of OpenCL conformance test basic/vload_private/vstore_private on target amdgcn---amdgizcl.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35361
llvm-svn: 314566
Without this, we could end up trying to get the Nth (0-indexed) element
from a subvector of size N.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37880
llvm-svn: 314380
This teach simplifyDemandedBits to handle constant splat vector shifts.
This required changing some uses of getZExtValue to getLimitedValue since we can't rely on legalization using getShiftAmountTy for the shift amount.
I believe there may have been a bug in the ((X << C1) >>u ShAmt) handling where we didn't check if the inner shift was too large. I've fixed that here.
I had to add new patterns to ARM because the zext/sext the patterns were trying to look for got turned into an any_extend with this patch. Happy to split that out too, but not sure how to test without this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37665
llvm-svn: 314139
Summary:
This code iterates the 'Orders' vector in parallel with the DbgValue
list, emitting all DBG_VALUEs that occurred between the last IR order
insertion point and the next insertion point. This assumes the
SDDbgValue list is sorted in IR order, which it usually is. However, it
is not sorted when a node with a debug value is replaced with another
one. When this happens, TransferDbgValues is called, and the new value
is added to the end of the list.
The problem can be solved by stably sorting the list by IR order.
Reviewers: aprantl, Ka-Ka
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: MatzeB, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38197
llvm-svn: 314114
At least for the 64-bit and less case, we should be able to determine if we even have a mask without counting any bits. This also removes the need to explicitly check for 0 active bits, isMask will return false for 0.
llvm-svn: 313908
The fix is to avoid invalidating our insertion point in
replaceDbgDeclare:
Builder.insertDeclare(NewAddress, DIVar, DIExpr, Loc, InsertBefore);
+ if (DII == InsertBefore)
+ InsertBefore = &*std::next(InsertBefore->getIterator());
DII->eraseFromParent();
I had to write a unit tests for this instead of a lit test because the
use list order matters in order to trigger the bug.
The reduced C test case for this was:
void useit(int*);
static inline void inlineme() {
int x[2];
useit(x);
}
void f() {
inlineme();
inlineme();
}
llvm-svn: 313905
Summary:
SelectionDAGISel::LowerArguments is associating arguments
with frame indices (FuncInfo->setArgumentFrameIndex). That
information is later on used by EmitFuncArgumentDbgValue to
create DBG_VALUE instructions that denotes that a variable
can be found on the stack.
I discovered that for our (big endian) out-of-tree target
the association created by SelectionDAGISel::LowerArguments
sometimes is wrong. I've seen this happen when a 64-bit value
is passed on the stack. The argument will occupy two stack
slots (frame index X, and frame index X+1). The fault is
that a call to setArgumentFrameIndex is associating the
64-bit argument with frame index X+1. The effect is that the
debug information (DBG_VALUE) will point at the least significant
part of the arguement on the stack. When printing the
argument in a debugger I will get the wrong value.
I managed to create a test case for PowerPC that seems to
show the same kind of problem.
The bugfix will look at the datalayout, taking endianness into
account when examining a BUILD_PAIR node, assuming that the
least significant part is in the first operand of the BUILD_PAIR.
For big endian targets we should use the frame index from
the second operand, as the most significant part will be stored
at the lower address (using the highest frame index).
Reviewers: bogner, rnk, hfinkel, sdardis, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: nemanjai, aprantl, llvm-commits, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37740
llvm-svn: 313901
