property file/line rather than the @synthesize file/line. Avoids
some nasty confusing-ness with conflating the file from the scope
and the line from the original declaration. Use the current scope
location as a separate parameter so that we can match it up
better in the line table with the beginning of the scope.
Update a couple of testcases accordingly since I had to change
that we actually use the passed in location in EmitFunctionStart
and for the new metadata parameter and add a new testcase to
make sure we've got the right line numbers for synthesized
properties.
Part of rdar://11026482
llvm-svn: 153917
the function body, but do so in a way that doesn't make any assumptions
about the static local actually having a proper, unique mangling,
since apparently we don't do that correctly at all.
llvm-svn: 153776
These patches cause us to miscompile and/or reject code with static
function-local variables in an extern-C context. Previously, we were
papering over this as long as the variables are within the same
translation unit, and had not seen any failures in the wild. We still
need a proper fix, which involves mangling static locals inside of an
extern-C block (as GCC already does), but this patch causes pretty
widespread regressions. Firefox, and many other applications no longer
build.
Lots of test cases have been posted to the list in response to this
commit, so there should be no problem reproducing the issues.
llvm-svn: 153768
the case that the variable already exists. Partly this is just
protection against people making crazy declarations with custom
asm labels or extern "C" names that intentionally collide with
the manglings of such variables, but the main reason is that we
can actually emit a static local variable twice with the
requirement that it match up. There may be other cases with
(e.g.) the various nested functions, but the main exemplar is
with constructor variants, where we can be forced into
double-emitting the function body under certain circumstances
like (currently) the presence of virtual bases.
llvm-svn: 153723
property file/line rather than the @synthesize file/line. Avoids
some nasty confusing-ness with conflating the file from the scope
and the line from the original declaration.
Update a couple of testcases accordingly since I had to change
that we actually use the passed in location in EmitFunctionStart.
Fixes rdar://11026482
llvm-svn: 153714
section. A 'normal' string will go into the __TEXT,__const section, but this
isn't good for UTF16 strings. The __ustring section allows for coalescing, among
other niceties (such as allowing the linker to easily split up strings).
Instead of outputting the UTF16 string as a series of bytes, output it as a
series of shorts. The back-end will then nicely place the UTF16 string into the
correct section, because it's a mensch.
<rdar://problem/10655949>
llvm-svn: 153710
LLVM intrinsics for.
I have an implementation of these functions, which wants to go in a libgcc_s
equivalent in compiler-rt. It's currently here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~theraven/atomic.c
It will be committed to compiler-rt as soon as I work out where would be a
sensible place to put it...
llvm-svn: 153666
flag as GCC uses: -fstrict-enums). There is a *lot* of code making
unwarranted assumptions about the underlying type of enums, and it
doesn't seem entirely reasonable to eagerly break all of it.
Much more importantly, the current state of affairs is *very* good at
optimizing based upon this information, which causes failures that are
very distant from the actual enum. Before we push for enabling this by
default, I think we need to implement -fcatch-undefined-behavior support
for instrumenting and trapping whenever we store or load a value outside
of the range. That way we can track down the misbehaving code very
quickly.
I discussed this with Rafael, and currently the only important cases he
is aware of are the bool range-based optimizations which are staying
hard enabled. We've not seen any issue with those either, and they are
much more important for performance.
llvm-svn: 153550
For i686 targets (eg. cygwin), I saw "Range must not be empty!" in verifier.
It produces (i32)[0x80000000:0x80000000) from (uint64_t)[0xFFFFFFFF80000000ULL:0x0000000080000000ULL), for signed i32 on MDNode::Range.
llvm-svn: 153382
% is a common character in IR so we'd crash on almost any malformed IR. The
diagnostic formatter expects a formatting directive when it sees an unescaped %.
llvm-svn: 152956
store to 1. This allows code-gen to select a more appropriate alignment. If left
to zero, an alignment greater than the alignment of the pointer may be selected,
causing code-gen to use instructions which require an alignment greater than the
pointer guarantees.
<rdar://problem/11043589>
llvm-svn: 152951
-fno-inline-functions.
This behaves much like -fno-inline in gcc, but based on a discussion with
Daniel it was decided that -fno-inline-functions should subsume -fno-inline.
Please speak up if you object. The -fno-inline flag remains ignored.
Final part of rdar://10972766
llvm-svn: 152754
function templates as well.
A future commit will mangle the added name with the template args
like classes are mangled.
Fixes rdar://10986010
llvm-svn: 152683
ObjCInterfaceDecl::getReferencedProtocols(), because the iterators are safe to use
even if the caller did not check that the interface is a definition.
llvm-svn: 152597
Renamed methods caseBegin, caseEnd and caseDefault with case_begin, case_end, and case_default.
Added some notes relative to case iterators.
llvm-svn: 152533
track whether the referenced declaration comes from an enclosing
local context. I'm amenable to suggestions about the exact meaning
of this bit.
llvm-svn: 152491
we correctly emit loads of BlockDeclRefExprs even when they
don't qualify as ODR-uses. I think I'm adequately convinced
that BlockDeclRefExpr can die.
llvm-svn: 152479
- We do this when it is easy to determine that the backend will pass them on
the stack properly by itself.
Currently LLVM codegen is really bad in some cases with byval, for example, on
the test case here (which is derived from Sema code, which likes to pass
SourceLocations around)::
struct s47 { unsigned a; };
void f47(int,int,int,int,int,int,struct s47);
void test47(int a, struct s47 b) { f47(a, a, a, a, a, a, b); }
we used to emit code like this::
...
movl %esi, -8(%rbp)
movl -8(%rbp), %ecx
movl %ecx, (%rsp)
...
to handle moving the struct onto the stack, which is just appalling.
Now we generate::
movl %esi, (%rsp)
which seems better, no?
llvm-svn: 152462
