from its pass harness by providing a lambda to query for AA results.
This allows the legacy pass to easily provide a lambda that uses the
special helpers to construct function AA results from a legacy CGSCC
pass. With the new pass manager (the next patch) the lambda just
directly wraps the intuitive query API.
llvm-svn: 251715
Update the discriminator assignment algorithm
* If a scope has already been assigned a discriminator, do not reassign a nested discriminator for it.
* If the file and line both match, even if the column does not match, we should assign a new discriminator for the stmt.
original code:
; #1 int foo(int i) {
; #2 if (i == 3 || i == 5) return 100; else return 99;
; #3 }
; i == 3: discriminator 0
; i == 5: discriminator 2
; return 100: discriminator 1
; return 99: discriminator 3
llvm-svn: 251689
Update the discriminator assignment algorithm
* If a scope has already been assigned a discriminator, do not reassign a nested discriminator for it.
* If the file and line both match, even if the column does not match, we should assign a new discriminator for the stmt.
original code:
; #1 int foo(int i) {
; #2 if (i == 3 || i == 5) return 100; else return 99;
; #3 }
; i == 3: discriminator 0
; i == 5: discriminator 2
; return 100: discriminator 1
; return 99: discriminator 3
llvm-svn: 251685
* If a scope has already been assigned a discriminator, do not reassign a nested discriminator for it.
* If the file and line both match, even if the column does not match, we should assign a new discriminator for the stmt.
original code:
; #1 int foo(int i) {
; #2 if (i == 3 || i == 5) return 100; else return 99;
; #3 }
; i == 3: discriminator 0
; i == 5: discriminator 2
; return 100: discriminator 1
; return 99: discriminator 3
llvm-svn: 251680
transformations in FunctionAttrs rather than building a new one each
time.
This isn't trivial because there are different heuristics from different
passes for exactly what set they want. The primary difference is whether
an *overridable* function completely disables the synthesis of
attributes. I've modeled this by directly testing for overridable, and
using the common set that excludes external and opt-none functions.
This does cause some changes by disabling more optimizations in the face
of opt-none. Specifically, we were still optimizing *calls* to opt-none
functions based on their attributes, just not the bodies. It seems
better to be conservative on both fronts given the intended semanticas
here (best effort to not assume or disturb anything). I've not tried to
test this change as it seems complex, brittle, and not important to the
implicit contract of opt-none. Instead, it seems more like a choice that
should be dictated by the simplified implementation and the change to be
acceptable differences within the space of opt-none.
A big benefit here is that these transformations no longer rely on the
legacy pass manager's SCC types, they just work on generic sets of
function pointers. This will make it easy to re-use their logic in the
new pass manager.
I've also made the transforms static functions instead of members where
trivial while I was touching the signatures.
llvm-svn: 251640
This patch unify the 39-bit and 42-bit mapping for aarch64 to use only
one instrumentation algorithm. This removes compiler flag
SANITIZER_AARCH64_VMA requirement for MSAN on aarch64.
The mapping to use now is for 39 and 42-bits:
0x00000000000ULL-0x01000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x01000000000ULL-0x02000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x02000000000ULL-0x03000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x03000000000ULL-0x04000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x04000000000ULL-0x05000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x05000000000ULL-0x06000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
0x06000000000ULL-0x07000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x07000000000ULL-0x08000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
And only for 42-bits:
0x08000000000ULL-0x09000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x09000000000ULL-0x0A000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x0A000000000ULL-0x0B000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x0B000000000ULL-0x0F000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x0F000000000ULL-0x10000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
0x10000000000ULL-0x11000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x11000000000ULL-0x12000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
0x12000000000ULL-0x17000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x17000000000ULL-0x18000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x18000000000ULL-0x19000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x19000000000ULL-0x20000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x20000000000ULL-0x21000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
0x21000000000ULL-0x26000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x26000000000ULL-0x27000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x27000000000ULL-0x28000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x28000000000ULL-0x29000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x29000000000ULL-0x2A000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x2A000000000ULL-0x2B000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
0x2B000000000ULL-0x2C000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x2C000000000ULL-0x2D000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x2D000000000ULL-0x2E000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x2E000000000ULL-0x2F000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
0x2F000000000ULL-0x39000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x39000000000ULL-0x3A000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x3A000000000ULL-0x3B000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x3B000000000ULL-0x3C000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
0x3C000000000ULL-0x3D000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x3D000000000ULL-0x3E000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x3E000000000ULL-0x3F000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x3F000000000ULL-0x40000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
And although complex it provides a better memory utilization that
previous one.
llvm-svn: 251624
Clang driver now injects -u<hook_var> flag in the linker
command line, in which case user function is not needed
any more.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14033
llvm-svn: 251612
Somewhat shockingly for an analysis pass which is computing constant ranges, LVI did not understand the ranges provided by range metadata.
As part of this change, I included a change to CVP primarily because doing so made it much easier to write small self contained test cases. CVP was previously only handling the non-local operand case, but given that LVI can sometimes figure out information about instructions standalone, I don't see any reason to restrict this. There could possibly be a compile time impact from this, but I suspect it should be minimal. If anyone has an example which substaintially regresses, please let me know. I could restrict the block local handling to ICmps feeding Terminator instructions if needed.
Note that this patch continues a somewhat bad practice in LVI. In many cases, we know facts about values, and separate context sensitive facts about values. LVI makes no effort to distinguish and will frequently cache the same value fact repeatedly for different contexts. I would like to change this, but that's a large enough change that I want it to go in separately with clear documentation of what's changing. Other examples of this include the non-null handling, and arguments.
As a meta comment: the entire motivation of this change was being able to write smaller (aka reasonable sized) test cases for a future patch teaching LVI about select instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13543
llvm-svn: 251606
The most common use case is when eliminating redundant range checks in an example like the following:
c = a[i+1] + a[i];
Note that all the smarts of the transform (the implication engine) is already in ValueTracking and is tested directly through InstructionSimplify.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13040
llvm-svn: 251596
To be able to maximize the bandwidth during vectorization, this patch provides a new flag vectorizer-maximize-bandwidth. When it is turned on, the vectorizer will determine the vectorization factor (VF) using the smallest instead of widest type in the loop. To avoid increasing register pressure too much, estimates of the register usage for different VFs are calculated so that we only choose a VF when its register usage doesn't exceed the number of available registers.
llvm-svn: 251592
This adds the flag -mllvm -sample-profile-check-coverage=N to the
SampleProfile pass. N is the percent of input sample records that the
user expects to apply. If the pass does not use N% (or more) of the
sample records in the input, it emits a warning.
This is useful to detect some forms of stale profiles. If the code has
drifted enough from the original profile, there will be records that do
not match the IR anymore.
This will not detect cases where a sample profile record for line L is
referring to some other instructions that also used to be at line L.
llvm-svn: 251568
Summary:
If P branches to Q conditional on C and Q branches to R conditional on
C' and C => C' then the branch conditional on C' can be folded to an
unconditional branch.
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13972
llvm-svn: 251557
The pass was keeping around a lot of per-function data (visited blocks,
edges, dominance, etc) that is just taking up memory for no reason. In
fact, from function to function it could potentially confuse the
propagator since some maps are indexed by line offsets which can be
common between functions.
llvm-svn: 251531
I think these were affected by a change way back when to stop printing newlines in Value::dump() by default. This change simply allows the debug output to be readable.
NFC.
llvm-svn: 251517
Summary:
This patch adds support to check if a loop has loop invariant conditions which lead to loop exits. If so, we know that if the exit path is taken, it is at the first loop iteration. If there is an induction variable used in that exit path whose value has not been updated, it will keep its initial value passing from loop preheader. We can therefore rewrite the exit value with
its initial value. This will help remove phis created by LCSSA and enable other optimizations like loop unswitch.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13974
llvm-svn: 251492
CatchReturnInst has side-effects: it runs a destructor. This destructor
could conceivably run forever/call exit/etc. and should not be removed.
llvm-svn: 251461
Summary:
This change could be way off-piste, I'm looking for any feedback on whether it's an acceptable approach.
It never seems to be a problem to gobble up as many reduction values as can be found, and then to attempt to reduce the resulting tree. Some of the workloads I'm looking at have been aggressively unrolled by hand, and by selecting reduction widths that are not constrained by a vector register size, it becomes possible to profitably vectorize. My test case shows such an unrolling which SLP was not vectorizing (on neither ARM nor X86) before this patch, but with it does vectorize.
I measure no significant compile time impact of this change when combined with D13949 and D14063. There are also no significant performance regressions on ARM/AArch64 in SPEC or LNT.
The more principled approach I thought of was to generate several candidate tree's and use the cost model to pick the cheapest one. That seemed like quite a big design change (the algorithms seem very much one-shot), and would likely be a costly thing for compile time. This seemed to do the job at very little cost, but I'm worried I've misunderstood something!
Reviewers: nadav, jmolloy
Subscribers: mssimpso, llvm-commits, aemerson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14116
llvm-svn: 251428
Summary:
Currently, when the SLP vectorizer considers whether a phi is part of a reduction, it dismisses phi's whose incoming blocks are not the same as the block containing the phi. For the patterns I'm looking at, extending this rule to allow phis whose incoming block is a containing loop latch allows me to vectorize certain workloads.
There is no significant compile-time impact, and combined with D13949, no performance improvement measured in ARM/AArch64 in any of SPEC2000, SPEC2006 or LNT.
Reviewers: jmolloy, mcrosier, nadav
Subscribers: mssimpso, nadav, aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14063
llvm-svn: 251425
Summary:
Certain workloads, in particular sum-of-absdiff loops, can be vectorized using SLP if it can treat select instructions as reduction values.
The test case is a bit awkward. The AArch64 cost model needs some tuning to not be so pessimistic about selects. I've had to tweak the SLP threshold here.
Reviewers: jmolloy, mzolotukhin, spatel, nadav
Subscribers: nadav, mssimpso, aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13949
llvm-svn: 251424
When emitting a remark for a conditional branch annotation, the remark
uses the line location information of the conditional branch in the
message. In some cases, that information is unavailable and the
optimization would segfaul. I'm still not sure whether this is a bug or
WAI, but the optimizer should not die because of this.
llvm-svn: 251420
No functionality changed here, but the indentation is substantially
reduced and IMO the code is much easier to read. I've also added some
helpful comments.
This is just a clean-up I wrote while studying the code, and that has
been in my backlog for a while.
llvm-svn: 251381
We should remove noalias along with dereference and dereference_or_null attributes
because statepoint could potentially touch the entire heap including noalias objects.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14032
llvm-svn: 251333
This adds a couple of optimization remarks to the SamplePGO
transformation. When it decides to inline a hot function (to mimic the
inline stack and repeat useful inline decisions in the original build).
It will also report branch destinations. For instance, given the code
fragment:
6 if (i < 1000)
7 sum -= i;
8 else
9 sum += -i * rand();
If the 'else' branch is taken most of the time, building this code with
-Rpass=sample-profile will produce:
a.cc:9:14: remark: most popular destination for conditional branches at small.cc:6:9 [-Rpass=sample-profile]
sum += -i * rand();
^
llvm-svn: 251330
Android libc provides a fixed TLS slot for the unsafe stack pointer,
and this change implements direct access to that slot on AArch64 via
__builtin_thread_pointer() + offset.
This change also moves more code into TargetLowering and its
target-specific subclasses to get rid of target-specific codegen
in SafeStackPass.
This change does not touch the ARM backend because ARM lowers
builting_thread_pointer as aeabi_read_tp, which is not available
on Android.
The previous iteration of this change was reverted in r250461. This
version leaves the generic, compiler-rt based implementation in
SafeStack.cpp instead of moving it to TargetLoweringBase in order to
allow testing without a TargetMachine.
llvm-svn: 251324
Vectorization of memory instruction (Load/Store) is possible when the pointer is coming from GEP. The GEP analysis allows to estimate the profit.
In some cases we have a "bitcast" between GEP and memory instruction.
I added code that skips the "bitcast".
http://reviews.llvm.org/D13886
llvm-svn: 251291
Summary:
InstCombine tries to transform GEP(PHI(GEP1, GEP2, ..)) into GEP(GEP(PHI(...))
when possible. However, this may leave the old PHI node around. Even if we
do end up folding the GEPs, having an extra PHI node might not be beneficial.
This change makes the transformation more conservative. We now only do this if
the PHI has only one use, and can therefore be removed after the transformation.
Reviewers: jmolloy, majnemer
Subscribers: mcrosier, mssimpso, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13887
llvm-svn: 251281
