class C {
void g(C c);
virtual void f() = 0;
};
In this case, C is not known to be abstract when doing semantic analysis on g. This is done by recursively traversing the abstract class and checking the types of member functions.
llvm-svn: 67594
a class template. At present, we can only instantiation normal
methods, but not constructors, destructors, or conversion operators.
As ever, this contains a bit of refactoring in Sema's type-checking. In
particular:
- Split ActOnFunctionDeclarator into ActOnFunctionDeclarator
(handling the declarator itself) and CheckFunctionDeclaration
(checking for the the function declaration), the latter of which
is also used by template instantiation.
- We were performing the adjustment of function parameter types in
three places; collect those into a single new routine.
- When the type of a parameter is adjusted, allocate an
OriginalParmVarDecl to keep track of the type as it was written.
- Eliminate a redundant check for out-of-line declarations of member
functions; hide more C++-specific checks on function declarations
behind if(getLangOptions().CPlusPlus).
llvm-svn: 67575
library function, accept this declaration and pretend that we do not
know that this is a library function. autoconf depends on this
(broken) behavior.
llvm-svn: 67541
F f;
where F is a typedef of a function type, then the function "f" has a
prototype. This is a slight tweak to Chris's suggested fix in
PR3817. Fixes PR3817 and PR3840.
llvm-svn: 67313
dependent qualified-ids such as
Fibonacci<N - 1>::value
where N is a template parameter. These references are "unresolved"
because the name is dependent and, therefore, cannot be resolved to a
declaration node (as we would do for a DeclRefExpr or
QualifiedDeclRefExpr). UnresolvedDeclRefExprs instantiate to
DeclRefExprs, QualifiedDeclRefExprs, etc.
Also, be a bit more careful about keeping only a single set of
specializations for a class template, and instantiating from the
definition of that template rather than a previous declaration. In
general, we need a better solution for this for all TagDecls, because
it's too easy to accidentally look at a declaration that isn't the
definition.
We can now process a simple Fibonacci computation described as a
template metaprogram.
llvm-svn: 67308
specialization names. This way, we keep track of sugared types like
std::vector<Real>
I believe we are now using QualifiedNameTypes everywhere we can. Next
step: QualifiedDeclRefExprs.
llvm-svn: 67268
qualified name, e.g.,
foo::x
so that we retain the nested-name-specifier as written in the source
code and can reproduce that qualified name when printing the types
back (e.g., in diagnostics). This is PR3493, which won't be complete
until finished the other tasks mentioned near the end of this commit.
The parser's representation of nested-name-specifiers, CXXScopeSpec,
is now a bit fatter, because it needs to contain the scopes that
precede each '::' and keep track of whether the global scoping
operator '::' was at the beginning. For example, we need to keep track
of the leading '::', 'foo', and 'bar' in
::foo::bar::x
The Action's CXXScopeTy * is no longer a DeclContext *. It's now the
opaque version of the new NestedNameSpecifier, which contains a single
component of a nested-name-specifier (either a DeclContext * or a Type
*, bitmangled).
The new sugar type QualifiedNameType composes a sequence of
NestedNameSpecifiers with a representation of the type we're actually
referring to. At present, we only build QualifiedNameType nodes within
Sema::getTypeName. This will be extended to other type-constructing
actions (e.g., ActOnClassTemplateId).
Also on the way: QualifiedDeclRefExprs will also store a sequence of
NestedNameSpecifiers, so that we can print out the property
nested-name-specifier. I expect to also use this for handling
dependent names like Fibonacci<I - 1>::value.
llvm-svn: 67265
Type pointer. This allows our nested-name-specifiers to retain more
information about the actual spelling (e.g., which typedef did the
user name, or what exact template arguments were used in the
template-id?). It will also allow us to have dependent
nested-name-specifiers that don't map to any DeclContext.
llvm-svn: 67140
quite as great as it sounds, because, while we can refer to the
enumerator values outside the template, e.g.,
adder<long, 3, 4>::value
we can't yet refer to them with dependent names, so no Fibonacci
(yet).
InstantiateClassTemplateSpecialization is getting messy; next commit
will put it into a less-ugly state.
llvm-svn: 67092
be CompoundStmts. I think this is a valid assumption, and felt that the API
should reflect it. Others please validate this assumption to make sure I didn't
break anything.
llvm-svn: 66814
class members to the corresponding in-class declaration.
Diagnose the erroneous use of 'static' on out-of-line definitions of
class members.
llvm-svn: 66740
template. More importantly, start to sort out the issues regarding
complete types and nested-name-specifiers, especially the question of:
when do we instantiate a class template specialization that occurs to
the left of a '::' in a nested-name-specifier?
llvm-svn: 66662
definitions. We were rejecting tentative definitions of incomplete
(which is bad), and now we don't.
This fix is partial because we don't do the end-of-translation-unit
initialization for tentative definitions that don't ever have any
initializers specified.
llvm-svn: 66584
prototype of the same function, where the promoted parameter types in
the K&R definition are not compatible with the types in the
prototype. Fixes PR2821.
llvm-svn: 66301
response to attempts to diagnose an "incomplete" type. This will force
us to use DiagnoseIncompleteType more regularly (rather than looking at
isIncompleteType), but that's also a good thing.
Implicit instantiation is still very simplistic, and will create a new
definition for the class template specialization (as it should) but it
only actually instantiates the base classes and attaches
those. Actually instantiating class members will follow.
Also, instantiate the types of non-type template parameters before
checking them, allowing, e.g.,
template<typename T, T Value> struct Constant;
to work properly.
llvm-svn: 65924
need them to evaluate redeclarations or call a function that hasn't
already been declared. We now keep a DenseMap of these locally-scoped
declarations so that they are not visible but can be quickly found,
e.g., when we're looking for previous declarations or before we go
ahead and implicitly declare a function that's being called. Fixes
PR3672.
llvm-svn: 65792
notice because it was a negative test with a fix suggested by
Jean-Daniel Dupas. Convert the test from a negative to a positive
test to catch stuff like this.
llvm-svn: 65708
- Move the 'LabelMap' from Sema to Scope. To avoid layering problems, the second element is now a 'StmtTy *', which makes the LabelMap a bit more verbose to deal with.
- Add 'ActiveScope' to Sema. Managed by ActOnStartOfFunctionDef(), ObjCActOnStartOfMethodDef(), ActOnBlockStmtExpr().
- Changed ActOnLabelStmt(), ActOnGotoStmt(), ActOnAddrLabel(), and ActOnFinishFunctionBody() to use the new ActiveScope.
- Added FIXME to workaround in ActOnFinishFunctionBody() (for dealing with C++ nested functions).
llvm-svn: 65694
