be CompoundStmts. I think this is a valid assumption, and felt that the API
should reflect it. Others please validate this assumption to make sure I didn't
break anything.
llvm-svn: 66814
class members to the corresponding in-class declaration.
Diagnose the erroneous use of 'static' on out-of-line definitions of
class members.
llvm-svn: 66740
template. More importantly, start to sort out the issues regarding
complete types and nested-name-specifiers, especially the question of:
when do we instantiate a class template specialization that occurs to
the left of a '::' in a nested-name-specifier?
llvm-svn: 66662
definitions. We were rejecting tentative definitions of incomplete
(which is bad), and now we don't.
This fix is partial because we don't do the end-of-translation-unit
initialization for tentative definitions that don't ever have any
initializers specified.
llvm-svn: 66584
prototype of the same function, where the promoted parameter types in
the K&R definition are not compatible with the types in the
prototype. Fixes PR2821.
llvm-svn: 66301
response to attempts to diagnose an "incomplete" type. This will force
us to use DiagnoseIncompleteType more regularly (rather than looking at
isIncompleteType), but that's also a good thing.
Implicit instantiation is still very simplistic, and will create a new
definition for the class template specialization (as it should) but it
only actually instantiates the base classes and attaches
those. Actually instantiating class members will follow.
Also, instantiate the types of non-type template parameters before
checking them, allowing, e.g.,
template<typename T, T Value> struct Constant;
to work properly.
llvm-svn: 65924
need them to evaluate redeclarations or call a function that hasn't
already been declared. We now keep a DenseMap of these locally-scoped
declarations so that they are not visible but can be quickly found,
e.g., when we're looking for previous declarations or before we go
ahead and implicitly declare a function that's being called. Fixes
PR3672.
llvm-svn: 65792
notice because it was a negative test with a fix suggested by
Jean-Daniel Dupas. Convert the test from a negative to a positive
test to catch stuff like this.
llvm-svn: 65708
- Move the 'LabelMap' from Sema to Scope. To avoid layering problems, the second element is now a 'StmtTy *', which makes the LabelMap a bit more verbose to deal with.
- Add 'ActiveScope' to Sema. Managed by ActOnStartOfFunctionDef(), ObjCActOnStartOfMethodDef(), ActOnBlockStmtExpr().
- Changed ActOnLabelStmt(), ActOnGotoStmt(), ActOnAddrLabel(), and ActOnFinishFunctionBody() to use the new ActiveScope.
- Added FIXME to workaround in ActOnFinishFunctionBody() (for dealing with C++ nested functions).
llvm-svn: 65694
As far as I know, this catches all cases of jumping into the scope of a
variable with a variably modified type (excluding statement
expressions) in C. This is missing some stuff we probably want to check
(other kinds of variably modified declarations, statement expressions,
indirect gotos/addresses of labels in a scope, ObjC @try/@finally, cleanup
attribute), the diagnostics aren't very good, and it's not particularly
efficient, but it's a decent start.
This patch is a slightly modified version of the patch I attached to
PR3259, and it fixes that bug. I was sort of planning on improving
it, but I think it's okay as-is, especially since it looks like CodeGen
doesn't have any use for this sort of data structure. The only
significant change I can think of from the version I attached to PR3259
is that this version skips running the checking code when a function
doesn't contain any labels.
This patch doesn't cover case statements, which also need similar
checking; I'm not sure how we should deal with that. Extending the goto
checking to also check case statements wouldn't be too hard; it's just a
matter of keeping track of the scope of the closest switch and checking that
the scope of every case is the same as the scope of the switch. That said,
it would likely be a performance hit to run this check on every
function (it's an extra pass over the entire function), so we probably want
some other solution.
llvm-svn: 65678
giving them rough classifications (normal types, never-canonical
types, always-dependent types, abstract type representations) and
making it far easier to make sure that we've hit all of the cases when
decoding types.
Switched some switch() statements on the type class over to using this
mechanism, and filtering out those things we don't care about. For
example, CodeGen should never see always-dependent or non-canonical
types, while debug info generation should never see always-dependent
types. More switch() statements on the type class need to be moved
over to using this approach, so that we'll get warnings when we add a
new type then fail to account for it somewhere in the compiler.
As part of this, some types have been renamed:
TypeOfExpr -> TypeOfExprType
FunctionTypeProto -> FunctionProtoType
FunctionTypeNoProto -> FunctionNoProtoType
There shouldn't be any functionality change...
llvm-svn: 65591
anymore. If we want to reuse bits and pieces to add strict checking for
constant initializers, we can dig them out of SVN history; the existing
code won't be useful as-is.
llvm-svn: 65502
only from a function definition (that does not have a prototype) are
only used to determine the compatible with other declarations of that
same function. In particular, when referencing the function we pretend
as if it does not have a prototype. Implement this behavior, which
fixes PR3626.
llvm-svn: 65460
external declarations to also support external variable
declarations. Unified the code for these two cases into two new
subroutines.
Note that we fail to diagnose cases like the one Neil pointed
out, where a visible non-external declaration hides an external
declaration by the same name. That will require some reshuffling of
name lookup.
llvm-svn: 65385
that declaration to global scope so that it can be found from other
scopes. This allows us to diagnose redeclaration errors for external
declarations across scopes. We also warn when name lookup finds such
an out-of-scope declaration. This is part of <rdar://problem/6127293>;
we'll also need to do the same thing for variables.
llvm-svn: 65373
- When we are declaring a function in local scope, we can merge with
a visible declaration from an outer scope if that declaration
refers to an entity with linkage. This behavior now works in C++
and properly ignores entities without linkage.
- Diagnose the use of "static" on a function declaration in local
scope.
- Diagnose the declaration of a static function after a non-static
declaration of the same function.
- Propagate the storage specifier to a function declaration from a
prior declaration (PR3425)
- Don't name-mangle "main"
llvm-svn: 65360
assertion when the ivars and method list was reset into the existing
interface. To fix this, mark decls as invalid when they are redefined,
and don't insert ivars/methods into invalid decls.
llvm-svn: 65340
helper isConstantInitializer) to check whether an initializer is
constant. This passes tests, but it's possible that it'll cause
regressions with real-world code.
Future work:
1. The diagnostics obtained this way are lower quality at the moment;
some work both here and in Evaluate is needed for accurate diagnostics.
2. We probably need some extra code when we're in -pedantic mode so we
can strictly enforce the rules in C99 6.6p7.
3. Dead code cleanup (this should wait until after 2, because we might
want to re-use some of the code).
llvm-svn: 65265
