LinkerScript used to be a template class, so we couldn't instantiate
that class in elf::link. We instantiated ScriptConfig class earlier
instead so that the linker script parser can store configurations to
the object.
Now that LinkerScript is not a template, it doesn't make sense to
separate ScriptConfig from LinkerScript. This patch merges them.
llvm-svn: 298457
This fixes pr32031 by representing the expressions results as a
SectionBase and offset. This allows us to use an input section
directly instead of getting lost trying to compute an offset in an
outputsection when not all the information is available yet.
This also creates a struct to represent the *value* of and expression,
allowing the expression itself to be a simple typedef. I think this is
easier to read and will make it easier to extend the expression
computation to handle more complicated cases.
llvm-svn: 298079
This also requires postponing the assignment the assignment of
symbols defined in input linker scripts since those can refer to
output sections and in case we don't have a SECTIONS command, we
need to wait until all output sections have been created and
assigned addresses.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30851
llvm-svn: 297802
That moves all members that s possible to move for now (all which
does not depend on ELFT templating).
After that change LinkerScript contains only 8 methods in total,
and I believe it is possible to move them all after tweaking other
parts of linker. And we will be able to have single class for
linkerscript at the end.
llvm-svn: 297735
We can move all not templated functionality to LinkerScriptBase.
Patch do that for hasPhdrsCommands() and shows how it helps to detemplate
things in other places.
Probably we should be able to merge these 2 classes into single one after such steps.
Even if not, it still looks as reasonable cleanup for me.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30895
llvm-svn: 297714
With this we have a single section hierarchy. It is a bit less code,
but the main advantage will be in a future patch being able to handle
foo = symbol_in_obj;
in a linker script. Currently that fails since we try to find the
output section of symbol_in_obj. With this we should be able to just
return an InputSection from the expression.
llvm-svn: 297313
That function doesn't use any member of SymbolTableSection, so I
couldn't see a reason to make it a member of that class. The function
takes a SymbolBody, so it is more natural to make it a member of
SymbolBody.
llvm-svn: 296433
The list of all input sections was defined in SymbolTable class for a
historical reason. The list itself is not a template. However, because
SymbolTable class is a template, we needed to pass around ELFT to access
the list. This patch moves the list out of the class so that it doesn't
need ELFT.
llvm-svn: 296309
With the current design an InputSection is basically anything that
goes directly in a OutputSection. That includes plain input section
but also synthetic sections, so this should probably not be a
template.
llvm-svn: 295993
