nicolas/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fixed: <rdar://problem/5881148>

Browse Source 
Problem:

In the recently refactored VisitDeref (which processes dereferences), we
were incorrectly skipping the node just generated for the subexpression
of the dereference.  This was a horrible regression.

llvm-svn: 50176
This commit is contained in:
Ted Kremenek
2008-04-23 20:12:28 +00:00
parent 6e9185093d
commit dd43aeee54
6 changed files with 61 additions and 87 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
clang/lib/Analysis/CFRefCount.cpp
View File

@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ public:
virtual void EvalCall(ExplodedNodeSet<ValueState>& Dst,
GRExprEngine& Eng,
GRStmtNodeBuilder<ValueState>& Builder,
CallExpr* CE, LVal L,
CallExpr* CE, RVal L,
ExplodedNode<ValueState>* Pred);
virtual void EvalObjCMessageExpr(ExplodedNodeSet<ValueState>& Dst,
@@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ void CFRefCount::ProcessNonLeakError(ExplodedNodeSet<ValueState>& Dst,
void CFRefCount::EvalCall(ExplodedNodeSet<ValueState>& Dst,
GRExprEngine& Eng,
GRStmtNodeBuilder<ValueState>& Builder,
CallExpr* CE, LVal L,
CallExpr* CE, RVal L,
ExplodedNode<ValueState>* Pred) {
ValueStateManager& StateMgr = Eng.getStateManager();