[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value.
This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] llvm-svn: 203364
This commit is contained in:
@@ -76,15 +76,14 @@ bool Sinking::AllUsesDominatedByBlock(Instruction *Inst,
|
||||
// This may leave a referencing dbg_value in the original block, before
|
||||
// the definition of the vreg. Dwarf generator handles this although the
|
||||
// user might not get the right info at runtime.
|
||||
for (Value::use_iterator I = Inst->use_begin(),
|
||||
E = Inst->use_end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
||||
for (Use &U : Inst->uses()) {
|
||||
// Determine the block of the use.
|
||||
Instruction *UseInst = cast<Instruction>(*I);
|
||||
Instruction *UseInst = cast<Instruction>(U.getUser());
|
||||
BasicBlock *UseBlock = UseInst->getParent();
|
||||
if (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(UseInst)) {
|
||||
// PHI nodes use the operand in the predecessor block, not the block with
|
||||
// the PHI.
|
||||
unsigned Num = PHINode::getIncomingValueNumForOperand(I.getOperandNo());
|
||||
unsigned Num = PHINode::getIncomingValueNumForOperand(U.getOperandNo());
|
||||
UseBlock = PN->getIncomingBlock(Num);
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Check that it dominates.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user