Revert 85678/85680. The decision is to stay with the current form of
indirectbr, thus we don't need "blockaddr(@func, null)". Eliminate it for simplicity. llvm-svn: 85699
This commit is contained in:
@@ -854,8 +854,7 @@ static void WriteConstants(unsigned FirstVal, unsigned LastVal,
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if (const BlockAddress *BA = dyn_cast<BlockAddress>(C)) {
|
||||
assert((!BA->getBasicBlock() ||
|
||||
BA->getFunction() == BA->getBasicBlock()->getParent()) &&
|
||||
assert(BA->getFunction() == BA->getBasicBlock()->getParent() &&
|
||||
"Malformed blockaddress");
|
||||
Code = bitc::CST_CODE_BLOCKADDRESS;
|
||||
Record.push_back(VE.getTypeID(BA->getFunction()->getType()));
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user