Fixed the way set/show variables were being accessed to being natively
accessed by the objects that own the settings. The previous approach wasn't very usable and made for a lot of unnecessary code just to access variables that were already owned by the objects. While I fixed those things, I saw that CommandObject objects should really have a reference to their command interpreter so they can access the terminal with if they want to output usaage. Fixed up all CommandObjects to take an interpreter and cleaned up the API to not need the interpreter to be passed in. Fixed the disassemble command to output the usage if no options are passed down and arguments are passed (all disassebmle variants take options, there are no "args only"). llvm-svn: 114252
This commit is contained in:
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ _check_and_flush (FILE *stream)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ScriptInterpreterPython::ScriptInterpreterPython (CommandInterpreter &interpreter) :
|
||||
ScriptInterpreter (eScriptLanguagePython),
|
||||
ScriptInterpreter (interpreter, eScriptLanguagePython),
|
||||
m_compiled_module (NULL),
|
||||
m_termios_valid (false)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -254,9 +254,7 @@ ScriptInterpreterPython::~ScriptInterpreterPython ()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool
|
||||
ScriptInterpreterPython::ExecuteOneLine (CommandInterpreter &interpreter,
|
||||
const char *command,
|
||||
CommandReturnObject *result = 0)
|
||||
ScriptInterpreterPython::ExecuteOneLine (const char *command, CommandReturnObject *result)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (command)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -357,11 +355,11 @@ ScriptInterpreterPython::InputReaderCallback
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
ScriptInterpreterPython::ExecuteInterpreterLoop (CommandInterpreter &interpreter)
|
||||
ScriptInterpreterPython::ExecuteInterpreterLoop ()
|
||||
{
|
||||
Timer scoped_timer (__PRETTY_FUNCTION__, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__);
|
||||
|
||||
Debugger &debugger = interpreter.GetDebugger();
|
||||
Debugger &debugger = m_interpreter.GetDebugger();
|
||||
|
||||
// At the moment, the only time the debugger does not have an input file handle is when this is called
|
||||
// directly from Python, in which case it is both dangerous and unnecessary (not to mention confusing) to
|
||||
@@ -384,7 +382,7 @@ ScriptInterpreterPython::ExecuteInterpreterLoop (CommandInterpreter &interpreter
|
||||
if (error.Success())
|
||||
{
|
||||
debugger.PushInputReader (reader_sp);
|
||||
ExecuteOneLine (interpreter, "run_python_interpreter(ConsoleDict)");
|
||||
ExecuteOneLine ("run_python_interpreter(ConsoleDict)", NULL);
|
||||
debugger.PopInputReader (reader_sp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -643,11 +641,10 @@ ScriptInterpreterPython::GenerateBreakpointOptionsCommandCallback
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
ScriptInterpreterPython::CollectDataForBreakpointCommandCallback (CommandInterpreter &interpreter,
|
||||
BreakpointOptions *bp_options,
|
||||
ScriptInterpreterPython::CollectDataForBreakpointCommandCallback (BreakpointOptions *bp_options,
|
||||
CommandReturnObject &result)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Debugger &debugger = interpreter.GetDebugger();
|
||||
Debugger &debugger = m_interpreter.GetDebugger();
|
||||
InputReaderSP reader_sp (new InputReader (debugger));
|
||||
|
||||
if (reader_sp)
|
||||
@@ -677,8 +674,7 @@ ScriptInterpreterPython::CollectDataForBreakpointCommandCallback (CommandInterpr
|
||||
|
||||
// Set a Python one-liner as the callback for the breakpoint.
|
||||
void
|
||||
ScriptInterpreterPython::SetBreakpointCommandCallback (CommandInterpreter &interpreter,
|
||||
BreakpointOptions *bp_options,
|
||||
ScriptInterpreterPython::SetBreakpointCommandCallback (BreakpointOptions *bp_options,
|
||||
const char *oneliner)
|
||||
{
|
||||
std::auto_ptr<BreakpointOptions::CommandData> data_ap(new BreakpointOptions::CommandData());
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user