Analysis: Make %I in printf more reasonable, add more tests

llvm-svn: 188992
This commit is contained in:
David Majnemer
2013-08-22 07:53:21 +00:00
parent a31a882f87
commit a39da8e236
2 changed files with 22 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@@ -296,8 +296,9 @@ ArgType PrintfSpecifier::getArgType(ASTContext &Ctx,
// FIXME: How to get the corresponding signed version of size_t?
return ArgType();
case LengthModifier::AsInt3264:
return Ctx.getTargetInfo().getTriple().isArch64Bit() ? Ctx.LongLongTy
: Ctx.IntTy;
return Ctx.getTargetInfo().getTriple().isArch64Bit()
? ArgType(Ctx.LongLongTy, "__int64")
: ArgType(Ctx.IntTy, "__int32");
case LengthModifier::AsPtrDiff:
return ArgType(Ctx.getPointerDiffType(), "ptrdiff_t");
case LengthModifier::AsAllocate:
@@ -328,8 +329,8 @@ ArgType PrintfSpecifier::getArgType(ASTContext &Ctx,
return ArgType(Ctx.getSizeType(), "size_t");
case LengthModifier::AsInt3264:
return Ctx.getTargetInfo().getTriple().isArch64Bit()
? Ctx.UnsignedLongLongTy
: Ctx.UnsignedIntTy;
? ArgType(Ctx.UnsignedLongLongTy, "unsigned __int64")
: ArgType(Ctx.UnsignedIntTy, "unsigned __int32");
case LengthModifier::AsPtrDiff:
// FIXME: How to get the corresponding unsigned
// version of ptrdiff_t?