Added llvm.module flag for strict vtable pointers
It is dangerous to do LTO on code with strict-vtable-pointers, because one module has invariant.group.barriers, and the other one not. In the future I want to just strip all invariant.group metadata from vptrs loads/stores and get rid of invariant.group.barrier calls. http://reviews.llvm.org/D12580 llvm-svn: 247724
This commit is contained in:
@@ -398,6 +398,22 @@ void CodeGenModule::Release() {
|
||||
// Indicate that we want CodeView in the metadata.
|
||||
getModule().addModuleFlag(llvm::Module::Warning, "CodeView", 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (CodeGenOpts.OptimizationLevel > 0 && CodeGenOpts.StrictVTablePointers) {
|
||||
// We don't support LTO with 2 with different StrictVTablePointers
|
||||
// FIXME: we could support it by stripping all the information introduced
|
||||
// by StrictVTablePointers.
|
||||
|
||||
getModule().addModuleFlag(llvm::Module::Error, "StrictVTablePointers",1);
|
||||
|
||||
llvm::Metadata *Ops[2] = {
|
||||
llvm::MDString::get(VMContext, "StrictVTablePointers"),
|
||||
llvm::ConstantAsMetadata::get(llvm::ConstantInt::get(
|
||||
llvm::Type::getInt32Ty(VMContext), 1))};
|
||||
|
||||
getModule().addModuleFlag(llvm::Module::Require,
|
||||
"StrictVTablePointersRequirement",
|
||||
llvm::MDNode::get(VMContext, Ops));
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (DebugInfo)
|
||||
// We support a single version in the linked module. The LLVM
|
||||
// parser will drop debug info with a different version number
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user