Disambiguation of '[[':
* In C++11, '[[' is ill-formed unless it starts an attribute-specifier. Reject array sizes and array indexes which begin with a lambda-expression. Recover by parsing the lambda as a lambda. * In Objective-C++11, either '[' could be the start of a message-send. Fully disambiguate this case: it turns out that the grammars of message-sends, lambdas and attributes do not actually overlap. Accept any occurrence of '[[' where either '[' starts a message send, but reject a lambda in an array index just like in C++11 mode. Implement a couple of changes to the attribute wording which occurred after our attributes implementation landed: * In a function-declaration, the attributes go after the exception specification, not after the right paren. * A reference type can have attributes applied. * An 'identifier' in an attribute can also be a keyword. Support for alternative tokens (iso646 keywords) in attributes to follow. And some bug fixes: * Parse attributes after declarator-ids, even if they are not simple identifiers. * Do not accept attributes after a parenthesized declarator. * Accept attributes after an array size in a new-type-id. * Partially disamiguate 'delete' followed by a lambda. More work is required here for the case where the lambda-introducer is '[]'. llvm-svn: 154369
This commit is contained in:
@@ -211,6 +211,11 @@ ExprResult Parser::ParseInitializerWithPotentialDesignator() {
|
||||
// [foo ... bar] -> array designator
|
||||
// [4][foo bar] -> obsolete GNU designation with objc message send.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// We do not need to check for an expression starting with [[ here. If it
|
||||
// contains an Objective-C message send, then it is not an ill-formed
|
||||
// attribute. If it is a lambda-expression within an array-designator, then
|
||||
// it will be rejected because a constant-expression cannot begin with a
|
||||
// lambda-expression.
|
||||
InMessageExpressionRAIIObject InMessage(*this, true);
|
||||
|
||||
BalancedDelimiterTracker T(*this, tok::l_square);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user