It's valid to take the blockaddress of a different function, so remove this
assert in the bitcode writer. No change needed because the ValueEnumerator holds a whole-module numbering anyhow. Fixes PR9857! llvm-svn: 131016
This commit is contained in:
@@ -871,8 +871,6 @@ static void WriteConstants(unsigned FirstVal, unsigned LastVal,
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if (const BlockAddress *BA = dyn_cast<BlockAddress>(C)) {
|
||||
assert(BA->getFunction() == BA->getBasicBlock()->getParent() &&
|
||||
"Malformed blockaddress");
|
||||
Code = bitc::CST_CODE_BLOCKADDRESS;
|
||||
Record.push_back(VE.getTypeID(BA->getFunction()->getType()));
|
||||
Record.push_back(VE.getValueID(BA->getFunction()));
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user