Improve sub-register def handling in ProcessImplicitDefs.
This boils down to using MachineOperand::readsReg() more. This fixes PR11829 where a use ended up after the first def when lowering REG_SEQUENCE instructions involving IMPLICIT_DEFs. llvm-svn: 148996
This commit is contained in:
@@ -50,10 +50,10 @@ ProcessImplicitDefs::CanTurnIntoImplicitDef(MachineInstr *MI,
|
||||
SmallSet<unsigned, 8> &ImpDefRegs) {
|
||||
switch(OpIdx) {
|
||||
case 1:
|
||||
return MI->isCopy() && (MI->getOperand(0).getSubReg() == 0 ||
|
||||
return MI->isCopy() && (!MI->getOperand(0).readsReg() ||
|
||||
ImpDefRegs.count(MI->getOperand(0).getReg()));
|
||||
case 2:
|
||||
return MI->isSubregToReg() && (MI->getOperand(0).getSubReg() == 0 ||
|
||||
return MI->isSubregToReg() && (!MI->getOperand(0).readsReg() ||
|
||||
ImpDefRegs.count(MI->getOperand(0).getReg()));
|
||||
default: return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static bool isUndefCopy(MachineInstr *MI, unsigned Reg,
|
||||
MachineOperand &MO1 = MI->getOperand(1);
|
||||
if (MO1.getReg() != Reg)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
if (!MO0.getSubReg() || ImpDefRegs.count(MO0.getReg()))
|
||||
if (!MO0.readsReg() || ImpDefRegs.count(MO0.getReg()))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -105,7 +105,9 @@ bool ProcessImplicitDefs::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &fn) {
|
||||
MachineInstr *MI = &*I;
|
||||
++I;
|
||||
if (MI->isImplicitDef()) {
|
||||
if (MI->getOperand(0).getSubReg())
|
||||
ImpDefMIs.push_back(MI);
|
||||
// Is this a sub-register read-modify-write?
|
||||
if (MI->getOperand(0).readsReg())
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
unsigned Reg = MI->getOperand(0).getReg();
|
||||
ImpDefRegs.insert(Reg);
|
||||
@@ -113,12 +115,11 @@ bool ProcessImplicitDefs::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &fn) {
|
||||
for (const unsigned *SS = TRI->getSubRegisters(Reg); *SS; ++SS)
|
||||
ImpDefRegs.insert(*SS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
ImpDefMIs.push_back(MI);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Eliminate %reg1032:sub<def> = COPY undef.
|
||||
if (MI->isCopy() && MI->getOperand(0).getSubReg()) {
|
||||
if (MI->isCopy() && MI->getOperand(0).readsReg()) {
|
||||
MachineOperand &MO = MI->getOperand(1);
|
||||
if (MO.isUndef() || ImpDefRegs.count(MO.getReg())) {
|
||||
if (MO.isKill()) {
|
||||
@@ -140,7 +141,7 @@ bool ProcessImplicitDefs::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &fn) {
|
||||
bool ChangedToImpDef = false;
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0, e = MI->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
|
||||
MachineOperand& MO = MI->getOperand(i);
|
||||
if (!MO.isReg() || (MO.isDef() && !MO.getSubReg()) || MO.isUndef())
|
||||
if (!MO.isReg() || !MO.readsReg())
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
unsigned Reg = MO.getReg();
|
||||
if (!Reg)
|
||||
@@ -172,10 +173,10 @@ bool ProcessImplicitDefs::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &fn) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (MO.isKill() || MI->isRegTiedToDefOperand(i)) {
|
||||
// Make sure other uses of
|
||||
// Make sure other reads of Reg are also marked <undef>.
|
||||
for (unsigned j = i+1; j != e; ++j) {
|
||||
MachineOperand &MOJ = MI->getOperand(j);
|
||||
if (MOJ.isReg() && MOJ.isUse() && MOJ.getReg() == Reg)
|
||||
if (MOJ.isReg() && MOJ.getReg() == Reg && MOJ.readsReg())
|
||||
MOJ.setIsUndef();
|
||||
}
|
||||
ImpDefRegs.erase(Reg);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user