Bring back "Assert that we have all use/users in the getters."
This reverts commit r257751, bringing back r256105. The problem the assert found was fixed in r257915. Original commit message: Assert that we have all use/users in the getters. An error that is pretty easy to make is to use the lazy bitcode reader and then do something like if (V.use_empty()) The problem is that uses in unmaterialized functions are not accounted for. This patch adds asserts that all uses are known. llvm-svn: 257920
This commit is contained in:
@@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ static void forEachUser(const Value *User,
|
||||
llvm::function_ref<bool(const Value *)> Callback) {
|
||||
if (!Visited.insert(User).second)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
for (const Value *TheNextUser : User->users())
|
||||
for (const Value *TheNextUser : User->materialized_users())
|
||||
if (Callback(TheNextUser))
|
||||
forEachUser(TheNextUser, Visited, Callback);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1944,7 +1944,9 @@ void Verifier::visitFunction(const Function &F) {
|
||||
|
||||
// If this function is actually an intrinsic, verify that it is only used in
|
||||
// direct call/invokes, never having its "address taken".
|
||||
if (F.getIntrinsicID()) {
|
||||
// Only do this if the module is materialized, otherwise we don't have all the
|
||||
// uses.
|
||||
if (F.getIntrinsicID() && F.getParent()->isMaterialized()) {
|
||||
const User *U;
|
||||
if (F.hasAddressTaken(&U))
|
||||
Assert(0, "Invalid user of intrinsic instruction!", U);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user