Debug Info: Simplify Frame Index handling in DBG_VALUE Machine Instructions

Rather than using the full power of target-specific addressing modes in
DBG_VALUEs with Frame Indicies, simply use Frame Index + Offset. This
reduces the complexity of debug info handling down to two
representations of values (reg+offset and frame index+offset) rather
than three or four.

Ideally we could ensure that frame indicies had been eliminated by the
time we reached an assembly or dwarf generation, but I haven't spent the
time to figure out where the FIs are leaking through into that & whether
there's a good place to convert them. Some FI+offset=>reg+offset
conversion is done (see PrologEpilogInserter, for example) which is
necessary for some SelectionDAG assumptions about registers, I believe,
but it might be possible to make this a more thorough conversion &
ensure there are no remaining FIs no matter how instruction selection
is performed.

llvm-svn: 184066
This commit is contained in:
David Blaikie
2013-06-16 20:34:15 +00:00
parent 80d0554949
commit 0252265be0
14 changed files with 115 additions and 139 deletions

View File

@@ -921,17 +921,6 @@ void UserValue::insertDebugValue(MachineBasicBlock *MBB, SlotIndex Idx,
MachineOperand &Loc = locations[LocNo];
++NumInsertedDebugValues;
// Frame index locations may require a target callback.
if (Loc.isFI()) {
MachineInstr *MI = TII.emitFrameIndexDebugValue(*MBB->getParent(),
Loc.getIndex(), offset, variable,
findDebugLoc());
if (MI) {
MBB->insert(I, MI);
return;
}
}
// This is not a frame index, or the target is happy with a standard FI.
BuildMI(*MBB, I, findDebugLoc(), TII.get(TargetOpcode::DBG_VALUE))
.addOperand(Loc).addImm(offset).addMetadata(variable);
}
@@ -992,4 +981,3 @@ void LiveDebugVariables::dump() {
static_cast<LDVImpl*>(pImpl)->print(dbgs());
}
#endif